1997 MCC Smart vs. 1961 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Reliant Sabre Six (109 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Reliant Sabre Six weights approximately 166 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1961 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | MCC | Reliant |
Model | Smart | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1997 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 109 HP |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 179 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 816 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |