1997 MCC Smart vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 700 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | MCC | Pontiac |
| Model | Smart | Tempest |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
