1997 MCC Smart vs. 1965 NSU 1000
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 996 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 NSU 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1000. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1965 NSU 1000 | |
| Make | MCC | NSU |
| Model | Smart | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 43 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1500 mm |
