1997 MCC Smart vs. 1965 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 887 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 ZAZ 966 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1965 ZAZ 966. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1965 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 ZAZ 966 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1965 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | MCC | ZAZ |
| Model | Smart | 966 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 27 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
