1997 MCC Smart vs. 1966 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Corolla. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Corolla. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 60 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1966 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Smart | Corolla |
Year Released | 1997 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 51 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |