1997 MCC Smart vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 238 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | MCC | Riley |
| Model | Smart | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
