1997 MCC Smart vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover 3.5 (150 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover 3.5 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 3.5 weights approximately 985 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 Rover 3.5 has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rover 3.5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
| Make | MCC | Rover |
| Model | Smart | 3.5 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
