1997 MCC Smart vs. 1972 TVR 1600
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR 1600 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 TVR 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 TVR 1600 (84 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 TVR 1600 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 TVR 1600 weights approximately 246 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1972 TVR 1600 | |
| Make | MCC | TVR |
| Model | Smart | 1600 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 84 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 896 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
