1997 MCC Smart vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Nissan Cedric (106 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 700 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Nissan Cedric has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Nissan Cedric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 106 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
