1997 MCC Smart vs. 1976 Triumph Dolomite
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph Dolomite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph Dolomite would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Triumph Dolomite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Triumph Dolomite (57 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Triumph Dolomite should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Triumph Dolomite weights approximately 290 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1976 Triumph Dolomite | |
| Make | MCC | Triumph |
| Model | Smart | Dolomite |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 57 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1580 mm |
