1997 MCC Smart vs. 1979 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Starlet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Starlet would be higher. At 992 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Toyota Starlet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Toyota Starlet weights approximately 45 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1979 Toyota Starlet | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart | Starlet |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1979 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 695 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
