1997 MCC Smart vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 1,972 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Cressida (104 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 520 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart | Cressida |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
