1997 MCC Smart vs. 1980 Volkswagen Jetta
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volkswagen Jetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volkswagen Jetta would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volkswagen Jetta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volkswagen Jetta (59 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volkswagen Jetta should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volkswagen Jetta weights approximately 175 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Volkswagen Jetta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1980 Volkswagen Jetta | |
Make | MCC | Volkswagen |
Model | Smart | Jetta |
Year Released | 1997 | 1980 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 59 HP |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 142 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |