1997 MCC Smart vs. 1981 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,562 cc, 1981 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Toyota Celica (118 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Toyota Celica weights approximately 530 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1981 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart | Celica |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2562 cc |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |
