1997 MCC Smart vs. 1981 ZIL 4104
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,691 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 ZIL 4104 (310 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 2685 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 ZIL 4104 has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 ZIL 4104 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1981 ZIL 4104 | |
Make | MCC | ZIL |
Model | Smart | 4104 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 7691 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 310 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 3335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2090 mm |