1997 MCC Smart vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma (89 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 420 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | |
Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Smart | Sigma |
Year Released | 1997 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |