1997 MCC Smart vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 400 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | MCC | Mercury |
| Model | Smart | Lynx |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 51 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
