1997 MCC Smart vs. 1984 Triumph Acclaim
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Triumph Acclaim. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Triumph Acclaim would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Triumph Acclaim is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Triumph Acclaim (150 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Triumph Acclaim should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Triumph Acclaim weights approximately 160 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Triumph Acclaim, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1984 Triumph Acclaim | |
| Make | MCC | Triumph |
| Model | Smart | Acclaim |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
