1997 MCC Smart vs. 1985 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Nissan Cedric (102 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 625 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1985 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | Smart | Cedric |
Year Released | 1997 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 102 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |