1997 MCC Smart vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (88 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 760 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | MCC | Ford |
Model | Smart | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1997 | 1986 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 88 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |