1997 MCC Smart vs. 1986 Nissan Prairie
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Prairie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Prairie would be higher. At 1,485 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Nissan Prairie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Nissan Prairie (79 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Prairie should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Nissan Prairie weights approximately 325 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Prairie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1986 Nissan Prairie | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | Prairie |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1485 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 79 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
