1997 MCC Smart vs. 1986 Renault 18
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 18 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Renault 18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Renault 18 (63 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Renault 18 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Renault 18 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1986 Renault 18 | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Smart | 18 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 63 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |