1997 MCC Smart vs. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 790 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | MCC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Smart | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1997 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |