1997 MCC Smart vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass (180 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 593 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | MCC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Smart | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 180 HP |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1243 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
