1997 MCC Smart vs. 1994 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Fairlane (205 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 930 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1994 Ford Fairlane has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Ford Fairlane will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1994 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | MCC | Ford |
| Model | Smart | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 205 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1860 mm |
