1997 MCC Smart vs. 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace would be higher. At 2,446 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace (89 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1995 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Smart | Hi-Ace |
Year Released | 1997 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2446 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 89 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |