1997 MCC Smart vs. 1996 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Sentra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Sentra would be higher. At 1,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan Sentra (85 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 310 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 1996 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | Smart | Sentra |
Year Released | 1997 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 85 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |