1997 MCC Smart vs. 1996 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Plymouth Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Plymouth Voyager (131 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Plymouth Voyager should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Plymouth Voyager weights approximately 1156 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 1996 Plymouth Voyager | |
| Make | MCC | Plymouth |
| Model | Smart | Voyager |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 131 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1806 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1960 mm |
