1997 MCC Smart vs. 2001 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2001 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Terrano II (117 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Terrano II should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 975 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Nissan Terrano II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Terrano II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2001 Nissan Terrano II | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | Terrano II |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 2389 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 117 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1750 mm |
