1997 MCC Smart vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP) has 124 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1192 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Nissan X-Trail has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan X-Trail will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: