1997 MCC Smart vs. 2005 MG TF
To start off, 2005 MG TF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MG TF (134 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 MG TF weights approximately 530 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 2005 MG TF | |
Make | MCC | MG |
Model | Smart | TF |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 134 HP |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |