1997 MCC Smart vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 MG TF (114 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG TF weights approximately 520 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2006 MG TF | |
| Make | MCC | MG |
| Model | Smart | TF |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 114 HP |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
