1997 MCC Smart vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,477 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero (132 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 2006 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Smart | Pajero |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2477 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 132 HP |
Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 151 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |