1997 MCC Smart vs. 2006 Nissan Xterra
To start off, 2006 Nissan Xterra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Xterra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Xterra (265 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Xterra should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Xterra weights approximately 646 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Nissan Xterra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Xterra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2006 Nissan Xterra | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | Xterra |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 265 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1860 mm |
