1997 MCC Smart vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (118 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 724 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2008 Rover 75 | |
| Make | MCC | Rover |
| Model | Smart | 75 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
