1997 MCC Smart vs. 2009 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2009 Subaru Forester is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Forester (171 HP) has 118 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Forester weights approximately 820 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 2009 Subaru Forester | |
Make | MCC | Subaru |
Model | Smart | Forester |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 171 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |