1997 MCC Smart vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP) has 373 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 1101 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | MCC | Chevrolet |
| Model | Smart | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 426 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4836 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1918 mm |
