1997 MCC Smart vs. 2010 SSC Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Aero is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 SSC Aero (1,062 HP) has 1009 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SSC Aero weights approximately 643 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2010 SSC Aero | |
| Make | MCC | SSC |
| Model | Smart | Aero |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 1062 HP |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 380 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1293 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2080 mm |
