1997 MCC Smart vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 624 cc (2 cylinders), 2010 Tata Nano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 MCC Smart weights approximately 50 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | MCC | Tata |
| Model | Smart | Nano |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 35 HP |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1495 mm |
