1997 MCC Smart vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford C-Max (95 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 900 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | MCC | Ford |
Model | Smart | C-Max |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 95 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1828 mm |