1997 MCC Smart vs. 2011 Ford E-350
To start off, 2011 Ford E-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-350 (255 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-350 weights approximately 2180 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford E-350 has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford E-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 2011 Ford E-350 | |
Make | MCC | Ford |
Model | Smart | E-350 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 255 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2017 mm |