1997 MCC Smart vs. 2011 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,300 cc, 2011 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2011 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | MCC | Mazda |
| Model | Smart | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 232 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
