1997 MCC Smart vs. 2012 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2012 Seat Exeo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Seat Exeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Seat Exeo (101 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Seat Exeo weights approximately 750 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 MCC Smart | 2012 Seat Exeo | |
| Make | MCC | Seat |
| Model | Smart | Exeo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 599 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 101 HP |
| Top Speed | 129 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4661 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1772 mm |
