1997 MCC Smart vs. 2013 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2013 Subaru Forester is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,500 cc (16 cylinders), 2013 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Subaru Forester (168 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Subaru Forester weights approximately 830 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 MCC Smart | 2013 Subaru Forester | |
Make | MCC | Subaru |
Model | Smart | Forester |
Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 599 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 168 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 2006 mm |