1997 Mercedes-Benz A vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,898 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz A weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A (180 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercedes-Benz A | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | A | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1898 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2050 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2380 mm |