1997 Mercedes-Benz A vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercedes-Benz A.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mercedes-Benz A | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A | FTO |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1689 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 17.3 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3580 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 3.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.6 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.5 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
