1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 420 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 2009 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | CLK | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2550 mm |