1997 Mercedes-Benz SLK vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 50 kg more than 1997 Mercedes-Benz SLK.
Because 1997 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mercedes-Benz SLK | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
| Model | SLK | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |
