1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch would be higher.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mercedes-Benz Swatch | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Toyota |
| Model | Swatch | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 245 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3270 mm |
