1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (582 HP) has 414 more horse power than 2006 Volvo V50. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo V50.
Because 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (773 Nm) has 542 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volvo V50. (231 Nm). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volvo V50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | T V-12 | V50 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7255 cc | 2345 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 582 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 773 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2650 mm |
